1.
Daher, Salam; Hochreiter, Jason; Schubert, Ryan; Gonzalez, Laura; Cendan, Juan; Anderson, Mindi; Diaz, Desiree; Welch, Gregory
Physical-Virtual Patient: A new patient simulator Journal Article
In: Society of Simulation in Healthcare Journal, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 115-121, 2020.
@article{daher2020physical,
title = {Physical-Virtual Patient: A new patient simulator},
author = {Salam Daher and Jason Hochreiter and Ryan Schubert and Laura Gonzalez and Juan Cendan and Mindi Anderson and Desiree Diaz and Gregory Welch },
url = {https://journals.lww.com/simulationinhealthcare/fulltext/2020/04000/the_physical_virtual_patient_simulator__a_physical.9.aspx},
doi = {10.1097/SIH.0000000000000409},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-04-01},
urldate = {2020-04-01},
journal = {Society of Simulation in Healthcare Journal},
volume = {15},
issue = {2},
pages = {115-121},
abstract = {Introduction: We introduce a new type of patient simulator referred to as the Physical-Virtual Patient Simulator (PVPS). The PVPS combines the tangible characteristics of a human-shaped physical form with the flexibility and richness of a virtual patient. The PVPS can exhibit a range of multisensory cues, including visual cues (eg, capillary refill, facial expressions, appearance changes), auditory cues (eg, verbal responses, heart sounds), and tactile cues (eg, localized temperature, pulse).
Methods: We describe the implementation of the technology, technical testing with healthcare experts, and an institutional review board–approved pilot experiment involving 22 nurse practitioner students interacting with a simulated child in 2 scenarios: sepsis and child abuse. The nurse practitioners were asked qualitative questions about ease of use and the cues they noticed.
Results: Participants found it easy to interact with the PVPS and had mixed but encouraging responses regarding realism. In the sepsis scenario, participants reported the following cues leading to their diagnoses: temperature, voice, mottled skin, attitude and facial expressions, breathing and cough, vitals and oxygen saturation, and appearance of the mouth and tongue. For the child abuse scenario, they reported the skin appearance on the arms and abdomen, perceived attitude, facial expressions, and inconsistent stories.
Conclusions: We are encouraged by the initial results and user feedback regarding the perceived realism of visual (eg, mottling), audio (eg, breathing sounds), and tactile (eg, temperature) cues displayed by the PVPS, and ease of interaction with the simulator.(Sim Healthcare 15:115–121, 2020)},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Introduction: We introduce a new type of patient simulator referred to as the Physical-Virtual Patient Simulator (PVPS). The PVPS combines the tangible characteristics of a human-shaped physical form with the flexibility and richness of a virtual patient. The PVPS can exhibit a range of multisensory cues, including visual cues (eg, capillary refill, facial expressions, appearance changes), auditory cues (eg, verbal responses, heart sounds), and tactile cues (eg, localized temperature, pulse).
Methods: We describe the implementation of the technology, technical testing with healthcare experts, and an institutional review board–approved pilot experiment involving 22 nurse practitioner students interacting with a simulated child in 2 scenarios: sepsis and child abuse. The nurse practitioners were asked qualitative questions about ease of use and the cues they noticed.
Results: Participants found it easy to interact with the PVPS and had mixed but encouraging responses regarding realism. In the sepsis scenario, participants reported the following cues leading to their diagnoses: temperature, voice, mottled skin, attitude and facial expressions, breathing and cough, vitals and oxygen saturation, and appearance of the mouth and tongue. For the child abuse scenario, they reported the skin appearance on the arms and abdomen, perceived attitude, facial expressions, and inconsistent stories.
Conclusions: We are encouraged by the initial results and user feedback regarding the perceived realism of visual (eg, mottling), audio (eg, breathing sounds), and tactile (eg, temperature) cues displayed by the PVPS, and ease of interaction with the simulator.(Sim Healthcare 15:115–121, 2020)
Methods: We describe the implementation of the technology, technical testing with healthcare experts, and an institutional review board–approved pilot experiment involving 22 nurse practitioner students interacting with a simulated child in 2 scenarios: sepsis and child abuse. The nurse practitioners were asked qualitative questions about ease of use and the cues they noticed.
Results: Participants found it easy to interact with the PVPS and had mixed but encouraging responses regarding realism. In the sepsis scenario, participants reported the following cues leading to their diagnoses: temperature, voice, mottled skin, attitude and facial expressions, breathing and cough, vitals and oxygen saturation, and appearance of the mouth and tongue. For the child abuse scenario, they reported the skin appearance on the arms and abdomen, perceived attitude, facial expressions, and inconsistent stories.
Conclusions: We are encouraged by the initial results and user feedback regarding the perceived realism of visual (eg, mottling), audio (eg, breathing sounds), and tactile (eg, temperature) cues displayed by the PVPS, and ease of interaction with the simulator.(Sim Healthcare 15:115–121, 2020)
2020
Salam Daher, Jason Hochreiter, Ryan Schubert, Laura Gonzalez, Juan Cendan, Mindi Anderson, Desiree Diaz, Gregory Welch
Physical-Virtual Patient: A new patient simulator Journal Article
In: Society of Simulation in Healthcare Journal, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 115-121, 2020.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: 2020, Desiree Diaz, development, evaluation, Gregory F Welch, Jason Hochreiter, Juan Cendan, Laura Gonzalez, Mindi Anderson, pediatric patient simulation, physical-virtual patient simulator, pilot study, pvp, Ryan Schubert, Salam Daher, sepsis
@article{daher2020physical,
title = {Physical-Virtual Patient: A new patient simulator},
author = {Salam Daher and Jason Hochreiter and Ryan Schubert and Laura Gonzalez and Juan Cendan and Mindi Anderson and Desiree Diaz and Gregory Welch },
url = {https://journals.lww.com/simulationinhealthcare/fulltext/2020/04000/the_physical_virtual_patient_simulator__a_physical.9.aspx},
doi = {10.1097/SIH.0000000000000409},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-04-01},
urldate = {2020-04-01},
journal = {Society of Simulation in Healthcare Journal},
volume = {15},
issue = {2},
pages = {115-121},
abstract = {Introduction: We introduce a new type of patient simulator referred to as the Physical-Virtual Patient Simulator (PVPS). The PVPS combines the tangible characteristics of a human-shaped physical form with the flexibility and richness of a virtual patient. The PVPS can exhibit a range of multisensory cues, including visual cues (eg, capillary refill, facial expressions, appearance changes), auditory cues (eg, verbal responses, heart sounds), and tactile cues (eg, localized temperature, pulse).
Methods: We describe the implementation of the technology, technical testing with healthcare experts, and an institutional review board–approved pilot experiment involving 22 nurse practitioner students interacting with a simulated child in 2 scenarios: sepsis and child abuse. The nurse practitioners were asked qualitative questions about ease of use and the cues they noticed.
Results: Participants found it easy to interact with the PVPS and had mixed but encouraging responses regarding realism. In the sepsis scenario, participants reported the following cues leading to their diagnoses: temperature, voice, mottled skin, attitude and facial expressions, breathing and cough, vitals and oxygen saturation, and appearance of the mouth and tongue. For the child abuse scenario, they reported the skin appearance on the arms and abdomen, perceived attitude, facial expressions, and inconsistent stories.
Conclusions: We are encouraged by the initial results and user feedback regarding the perceived realism of visual (eg, mottling), audio (eg, breathing sounds), and tactile (eg, temperature) cues displayed by the PVPS, and ease of interaction with the simulator.(Sim Healthcare 15:115–121, 2020)},
keywords = {2020, Desiree Diaz, development, evaluation, Gregory F Welch, Jason Hochreiter, Juan Cendan, Laura Gonzalez, Mindi Anderson, pediatric patient simulation, physical-virtual patient simulator, pilot study, pvp, Ryan Schubert, Salam Daher, sepsis},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Introduction: We introduce a new type of patient simulator referred to as the Physical-Virtual Patient Simulator (PVPS). The PVPS combines the tangible characteristics of a human-shaped physical form with the flexibility and richness of a virtual patient. The PVPS can exhibit a range of multisensory cues, including visual cues (eg, capillary refill, facial expressions, appearance changes), auditory cues (eg, verbal responses, heart sounds), and tactile cues (eg, localized temperature, pulse).
Methods: We describe the implementation of the technology, technical testing with healthcare experts, and an institutional review board–approved pilot experiment involving 22 nurse practitioner students interacting with a simulated child in 2 scenarios: sepsis and child abuse. The nurse practitioners were asked qualitative questions about ease of use and the cues they noticed.
Results: Participants found it easy to interact with the PVPS and had mixed but encouraging responses regarding realism. In the sepsis scenario, participants reported the following cues leading to their diagnoses: temperature, voice, mottled skin, attitude and facial expressions, breathing and cough, vitals and oxygen saturation, and appearance of the mouth and tongue. For the child abuse scenario, they reported the skin appearance on the arms and abdomen, perceived attitude, facial expressions, and inconsistent stories.
Conclusions: We are encouraged by the initial results and user feedback regarding the perceived realism of visual (eg, mottling), audio (eg, breathing sounds), and tactile (eg, temperature) cues displayed by the PVPS, and ease of interaction with the simulator.(Sim Healthcare 15:115–121, 2020)
Methods: We describe the implementation of the technology, technical testing with healthcare experts, and an institutional review board–approved pilot experiment involving 22 nurse practitioner students interacting with a simulated child in 2 scenarios: sepsis and child abuse. The nurse practitioners were asked qualitative questions about ease of use and the cues they noticed.
Results: Participants found it easy to interact with the PVPS and had mixed but encouraging responses regarding realism. In the sepsis scenario, participants reported the following cues leading to their diagnoses: temperature, voice, mottled skin, attitude and facial expressions, breathing and cough, vitals and oxygen saturation, and appearance of the mouth and tongue. For the child abuse scenario, they reported the skin appearance on the arms and abdomen, perceived attitude, facial expressions, and inconsistent stories.
Conclusions: We are encouraged by the initial results and user feedback regarding the perceived realism of visual (eg, mottling), audio (eg, breathing sounds), and tactile (eg, temperature) cues displayed by the PVPS, and ease of interaction with the simulator.(Sim Healthcare 15:115–121, 2020)